Despite strong contrary arguments, a McMaster University engineering professor steadfastly maintains the collapse of three World Trade Center buildings after the infamous 9/11 attacks can only be adequately explained if “controlled demolition” is part of the equation.
N.J. Burkett reporting as Twin Towers begin to collapse on September 11, 2001:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCPVNLLo-mI
Twenty years later, questions remain about the attacks on “9/11”
Who, among operatives in the CIA and 16 more American intelligence agencies, services, contractors and mercenaries… may have participated in or helped to establish the demolitions?
The alternative argument is they knew nothing, so they did nothing. I do not buy it.
The U.S. Intelligence Community is composed of the following 18 organizations:
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/what-we-do/members-of-the-ic
Did all of these agencies fail, or were some complicit?
Is the truth more than many want to know?
“We get answers that don’t answer;
Explanations that don’t explain;
And conclusions that don’t conclude.”
— Fred Hampton
9/11 – the big cover-up?
http://wilsonweb.physics.harvard.edu/HUMANRIGHTS/Risk/accidents/911_the_big_coverup.html
Even the chair of the 9/11 Commission now admits that the official evidence they were given was ‘far from the truth’.
What happened to the plane that hit the Pentagon?
(Just kinda disappeared…) A missile hit the Pentagon.
Why did building 7 collapse?
(Controlled Demolition of the offices and records of the CIA)
Why were on-site witnesses never interviewed by the commission?
Over 100 surviving firefighters and thousands of others reported multiple explosions from the base of the building and preceding the collapse of each story. These same firefighters saw this as controlled demolition.
They were not interviewed by federal investigators and their pleas and statements were dismissed by the corporate press.
(Evidently this commission was not interested in the truth. )
When did it become OK to remove evidence from a crime scene? (That day.)
How did a three steel skyscrapers defy the laws of physics?
Hint: (They did not. They had a bit of help.)
Hard Facts about the inside job:
History, is already speaking.
Lying Mainstream Media Ignore Expert New 9/11 WTC7 Demolition Report
This is a powerful documentary which features eyewitness accounts and archived news footage that was shot on September 11, 2001 but never replayed on televis…
Towers were built to withstand a Boeing jet(s). “I designed it for a 707 to hit it”, Leslie Robertson, WTC structural engineer. “Could probably sustain multiple impacts of jetliners”, “like a pencil puncturing screen netting” Frank De Martini, deceased Manager of WTC Construction & Project Management. “As far as a plane knocking a building over, that would not happen.” Charlie Thornton, Structural Engineer.
https://thepeaceresource.com/2015/09/11/24-facts-about-911-that-cannot-be-debunked/
Does Larry Silverstein ring a bell?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Am not certain regarding Silverstein’s musical inclinations.
LikeLike
But I put his statement in above, when he mentions the controlled demolition of building seven. I have seen controlled demolition from two blocks away. It looked exactly like the three buildings coming down. I knew the minute I saw it what had happened and so did hundreds of firefighters on the scene. Rank treason.
LikeLike
Pingback: 24 9/11 Facts That Can’t Be Debunked | The Peace Resource